Ending a Screen Action with an End element or a Destination to the '(Current Screen)' yields the same result. What is this statement?

The statement "Ending a Screen Action with an End element or a Destination to the '(Current Screen)' yields the same result" is indeed false. In the context of OutSystems development, using an End element specifically indicates the end of the logic in the screen action and returns control to the caller, concluding the current action's flow.

In contrast, setting a Destination to the '(Current Screen)' is fundamentally about the navigation approach rather than ending the action. It results in re-executing the current screen, which can lead to a refresh of the screen’s state and its data, altering the user experience based on how the screen is designed.

Therefore, while both methods are related to screen control, their implications and results differ significantly. Using the End element is definitive in halting the action, while routing back to the '(Current Screen)' prompts a refresh rather than an end to the action. This distinction underlines why the statement is considered false.